MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Michael Geerts [290th] vs Sebastian Fanselow [662nd] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-To-Head: Geerts 2 - 0 Fanselow

They have played 4 sets in total, with Geerts winning 4 and Fanselow winning 0. The last match between Geerts and Fanselow was at the M15 Quinta Do Lago, 08-11-2020, Semifinals, Hard with Michael Geerts getting the victory 6-3 6-3.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Michael Geerts 2
Sebastian Fanselow 0
Geerts vs Fanselow H2H Profile
Geerts Stats Fanselow
55% (16-13) YTD Win/Loss 43% (3-4)
2 Head-to-Head 0
290 Ranking 662
212 Highest Rank 273
30 Age 33
R Plays R
10 Titles 12
57% (390-296) Career Total W/L 59% (369-253)
$34,000 Career Prize Money $3,105
2 Hard H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Geerts VS Fanselow H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-3 6-3
cross
Michael Geerts
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
63% ( 30 of 48)
1st Serve %
69% ( 35 of 51)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
87% ( 26 of 30)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 22 of 35)
67% ( 12 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 8 of 16)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
21% ( 10 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 21 of 51)
59
Total Points Won
40
6-3 6-3
cross
Michael Geerts
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
57% ( 39 of 68)
1st Serve %
51% ( 31 of 61)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
69% ( 27 of 39)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 21 of 31)
45% ( 13 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 9 of 30)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
41% ( 28 of 68)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 31 of 61)
71
Total Points Won
58

Geerts VS Fanselow H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Geerts Vs Fanselow H2H Stats
Michael Geerts Geerts Stats Sebastian Fanselow Fanselow
2 H2H Matches 0
4 Sets Won 0
24 Games Won 12
4 Aces (Total) 4
4 Total Double Faults 10
1:33:0 Average Match Time 1:33:0
59% (69/116) 1st Serve % 59% (66/112)
77% (53/69) 1st Serve Win % 65% (43/66)
53% (25/47) 2nd Serve Win % 37% (17/46)
50% (8/16) Break Points Won % (Total) 29% (2/7)
46% (52/112) Return Points Win % 33% (38/116)
100% (2/2) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/2)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (2/2) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0)
0% (2/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (2/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Michael Geerts vs Sebastian Fanselow Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Geerts 2 - 0 Fanselow

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Geerts has won 46.58% of points on their second serve, while Fanselow has won 44.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Geerts, in recent form, has won 45.3% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fanselow has won 43.11%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.38% and 29.97% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Geerts has saved 52.05% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fanselow has saved 53.23% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Geerts has won 59.09% of matches played (W/L 52/ 36), with Fanselow winning 40.48% (W/L 17/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Geerts has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 181/ 110), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Fanselow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 204/ 121), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
  • Player level: In the last year, Geerts has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 27/ 27), where as Fanselow has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40.74% of matches (W/L 11/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Geerts winning 2 times and Fanselow being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Geerts winning 4 and Fanselow winning 0. The last match between Geerts and Fanselow was at the M15 Quinta Do Lago, 08-11-2020, Semifinals, Hard with Michael Geerts getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Geerts and Fanselow have played a deciding set 0 times, with Geerts winning 0 times and Fanselow 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Geerts winning 0, and Fanselow 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Geerts has played against opponents with an average rank of 376.92 while Fanselow has played against players with an average rank of 345.26.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Geerts has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fanselow has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Geerts has converted 34.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fanselow has converted 28.3% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Michael Geerts Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    QF
    cross
    Ricardas Berankis
    Player
    Michael Geerts
    62% ( 64 of 103)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 69 of 104)
    12
    Aces
    12
    5
    Double Faults
    3
    75% ( 48 of 64)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 48 of 69)
    46% ( 18 of 39)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 15 of 35)
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    44% ( 4 of 9)
    36% ( 37 of 103)
    Rtn Points Won
    39% ( 41 of 104)
    107
    Total Points Won
    100
    L
    6-4 4-6 7-6(5) H2H
    R2
    cross
    Michael Geerts
    Player
    Luca Potenza
    51% ( 49 of 96)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 62 of 110)
    9
    Aces
    7
    10
    Double Faults
    3
    86% ( 42 of 49)
    1st Serve Won
    65% ( 40 of 62)
    32% ( 15 of 47)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 23 of 48)
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 4 of 8)
    41% ( 39 of 96)
    Rtn Points Won
    43% ( 47 of 110)
    104
    Total Points Won
    102
    W
    2-6 7-6(5) 6-2 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Michael Geerts
    Player
    Adil Kalyanpur
    55% ( 23 of 42)
    1st Serve %
    78% ( 36 of 46)
    2
    Aces
    0
    0
    Double Faults
    0
    74% ( 17 of 23)
    1st Serve Won
    47% ( 17 of 36)
    68% ( 13 of 19)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 5 of 10)
    100% ( 5 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    29% ( 12 of 42)
    Rtn Points Won
    52% ( 24 of 46)
    54
    Total Points Won
    34
    W
    6-1 6-3 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Mika Brunold
    Player
    Michael Geerts
    65% ( 68 of 105)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 52 of 83)
    0
    Aces
    2
    3
    Double Faults
    2
    59% ( 40 of 68)
    1st Serve Won
    60% ( 31 of 52)
    57% ( 21 of 37)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 15 of 31)
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    27% ( 3 of 11)
    42% ( 44 of 105)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 37 of 83)
    98
    Total Points Won
    90
    L
    2-6 6-4 6-2 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Michael Geerts
    Player
    Giulio Zeppieri
    60% ( 25 of 42)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 33 of 53)
    2
    Aces
    3
    0
    Double Faults
    3
    88% ( 22 of 25)
    1st Serve Won
    61% ( 20 of 33)
    82% ( 14 of 17)
    2nd Serve Won
    55% ( 11 of 20)
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    14% ( 6 of 42)
    Rtn Points Won
    42% ( 22 of 53)
    58
    Total Points Won
    37
    W
    6-3 6-3 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Dalibor Svrcina
    Player
    Michael Geerts
    69% ( 33 of 48)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 30 of 54)
    0
    Aces
    3
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    76% ( 25 of 33)
    1st Serve Won
    50% ( 15 of 30)
    47% ( 7 of 15)
    2nd Serve Won
    38% ( 9 of 24)
    71% ( 5 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    33% ( 16 of 48)
    Rtn Points Won
    56% ( 30 of 54)
    62
    Total Points Won
    40
    L
    6-3 6-1 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Michael Geerts
    Player
    Robin Bertrand
    66% ( 29 of 44)
    1st Serve %
    57% ( 26 of 46)
    0
    Aces
    2
    1
    Double Faults
    1
    79% ( 23 of 29)
    1st Serve Won
    50% ( 13 of 26)
    53% ( 8 of 15)
    2nd Serve Won
    30% ( 6 of 20)
    83% ( 5 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    30% ( 13 of 44)
    Rtn Points Won
    59% ( 27 of 46)
    58
    Total Points Won
    32
    W
    6-1 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Michael Geerts
    Player
    Paul Jubb
    50% ( 20 of 40)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 29 of 49)
    1
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    85% ( 17 of 20)
    1st Serve Won
    52% ( 15 of 29)
    80% ( 16 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 9 of 20)
    50% ( 4 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 2)
    18% ( 7 of 40)
    Rtn Points Won
    51% ( 25 of 49)
    58
    Total Points Won
    31
    W
    6-2 6-1 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Alejandro Juan Mano
    Player
    Michael Geerts
    84% ( 41 of 49)
    1st Serve %
    48% ( 21 of 44)
    0
    Aces
    3
    1
    Double Faults
    4
    59% ( 24 of 41)
    1st Serve Won
    67% ( 14 of 21)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    2nd Serve Won
    26% ( 6 of 23)
    33% ( 3 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    17% ( 1 of 6)
    41% ( 20 of 49)
    Rtn Points Won
    55% ( 24 of 44)
    53
    Total Points Won
    40
    L
    6-2 7-6(2) H2H
    R1
    cross
    Michael Geerts
    Player
    Michiel De Krom
    49% ( 38 of 77)
    1st Serve %
    45% ( 31 of 69)
    0
    Aces
    2
    5
    Double Faults
    2
    66% ( 25 of 38)
    1st Serve Won
    71% ( 22 of 31)
    56% ( 22 of 39)
    2nd Serve Won
    42% ( 16 of 38)
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    30% ( 3 of 10)
    39% ( 30 of 77)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 31 of 69)
    78
    Total Points Won
    68
    W
    7-6(0) 6-4 H2H

    Sebastian Fanselow Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R1
    cross
    Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
    Player
    Sebastian Fanselow
    54% ( 38 of 70)
    1st Serve %
    50% ( 42 of 84)
    1
    Aces
    4
    9
    Double Faults
    6
    55% ( 21 of 38)
    1st Serve Won
    71% ( 30 of 42)
    53% ( 17 of 32)
    2nd Serve Won
    36% ( 15 of 42)
    27% ( 4 of 15)
    Break Points Won
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    46% ( 32 of 70)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 39 of 84)
    77
    Total Points Won
    77
    L
    2-6 6-4 2-0 ret. H2H
    R1
    cross
    Cezar Cretu
    Player
    Sebastian Fanselow
    60% ( 55 of 91)
    1st Serve %
    53% ( 40 of 75)
    4
    Aces
    2
    6
    Double Faults
    2
    62% ( 34 of 55)
    1st Serve Won
    65% ( 26 of 40)
    64% ( 23 of 36)
    2nd Serve Won
    57% ( 20 of 35)
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 3 of 12)
    37% ( 34 of 91)
    Rtn Points Won
    39% ( 29 of 75)
    86
    Total Points Won
    80
    L
    6-4 4-6 6-3 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Christian Djonov
    Player
    Sebastian Fanselow
    71% ( 48 of 68)
    1st Serve %
    74% ( 40 of 54)
    7
    Aces
    9
    0
    Double Faults
    2
    75% ( 36 of 48)
    1st Serve Won
    78% ( 31 of 40)
    75% ( 15 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    57% ( 8 of 14)
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 3)
    25% ( 17 of 68)
    Rtn Points Won
    28% ( 15 of 54)
    66
    Total Points Won
    56
    L
    7-6(0) 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Sebastian Fanselow
    Player
    Maik Steiner
    61% ( 50 of 82)
    1st Serve %
    55% ( 41 of 75)
    13
    Aces
    3
    1
    Double Faults
    5
    78% ( 39 of 50)
    1st Serve Won
    80% ( 33 of 41)
    66% ( 21 of 32)
    2nd Serve Won
    59% ( 20 of 34)
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 5)
    27% ( 22 of 82)
    Rtn Points Won
    29% ( 22 of 75)
    82
    Total Points Won
    75
    W
    7-5 7-6(6) H2H
    R1
    cross
    Alexander Ritschard
    Player
    Sebastian Fanselow
    49% ( 26 of 53)
    1st Serve %
    48% ( 29 of 60)
    2
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    85% ( 22 of 26)
    1st Serve Won
    52% ( 15 of 29)
    48% ( 13 of 27)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 15 of 31)
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 2 of 4)
    34% ( 18 of 53)
    Rtn Points Won
    50% ( 30 of 60)
    65
    Total Points Won
    48
    L
    6-4 6-4 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Sebastian Fanselow
    Player
    Mukund Sasikumar
    57% ( 33 of 58)
    1st Serve %
    41% ( 26 of 63)
    4
    Aces
    4
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    67% ( 22 of 33)
    1st Serve Won
    58% ( 15 of 26)
    52% ( 13 of 25)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 16 of 37)
    50% ( 5 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    40% ( 23 of 58)
    Rtn Points Won
    51% ( 32 of 63)
    67
    Total Points Won
    54
    W
    6-2 6-3 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Sebastian Fanselow
    Player
    Hazem Naow
    53% ( 33 of 62)
    1st Serve %
    57% ( 33 of 58)
    5
    Aces
    3
    5
    Double Faults
    8
    70% ( 23 of 33)
    1st Serve Won
    67% ( 22 of 33)
    52% ( 15 of 29)
    2nd Serve Won
    28% ( 7 of 25)
    45% ( 5 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 2 of 8)
    39% ( 24 of 62)
    Rtn Points Won
    50% ( 29 of 58)
    67
    Total Points Won
    53
    W
    6-3 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Pietro Orlando Fellin
    Player
    Sebastian Fanselow
    50% ( 24 of 48)
    1st Serve %
    55% ( 36 of 65)
    3
    Aces
    6
    2
    Double Faults
    7
    75% ( 18 of 24)
    1st Serve Won
    58% ( 21 of 36)
    46% ( 11 of 24)
    2nd Serve Won
    31% ( 9 of 29)
    46% ( 6 of 13)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 2 of 4)
    40% ( 19 of 48)
    Rtn Points Won
    54% ( 35 of 65)
    64
    Total Points Won
    49
    L
    6-3 6-2 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Pol Martin Tiffon
    Player
    Sebastian Fanselow
    48% ( 26 of 54)
    1st Serve %
    49% ( 22 of 45)
    0
    Aces
    1
    4
    Double Faults
    2
    85% ( 22 of 26)
    1st Serve Won
    64% ( 14 of 22)
    54% ( 15 of 28)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 11 of 23)
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    31% ( 17 of 54)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 20 of 45)
    57
    Total Points Won
    42
    L
    6-2 6-2 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Sebastian Fanselow
    Player
    Joaquin Aguilar Cardozo
    54% ( 67 of 124)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 75 of 113)
    3
    Aces
    1
    9
    Double Faults
    6
    66% ( 44 of 67)
    1st Serve Won
    67% ( 50 of 75)
    53% ( 30 of 57)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 19 of 38)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    42% ( 5 of 12)
    40% ( 50 of 124)
    Rtn Points Won
    39% ( 44 of 113)
    118
    Total Points Won
    119
    W
    7-5 2-6 7-6(8) H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Geerts & Fanselow Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Michael Geerts Geerts Stats Sebastian Fanselow Fanselow
    57% (390/296) Win/Loss 59% (369/253)
    56% (881/682) Sets Win/Loss 58% (829/607)
    52% (7690/7000) Games Win/Loss 53% (7174/6300)
    0.3 Aces Per Game 0.27
    2172 Aces Total 1784
    0.21 Double Faults Per Game 0.29
    1476 Total Double Faults 1920
    1:22:57 Average Match Time 1:29:23
    467.48 Average Opponent Rank 508.4
    59% (22096/37730) 1st Serve % 59% (22066/37275)
    71% (15625/22096) 1st Serve Win % 69% (15298/22066)
    51% (7944/15634) 2nd Serve Win % 49% (7480/15208)
    42% (1569/3734) Break Points Won % (Total) 43% (1727/4011)
    39% (14974/38102) Return Points Win % 41% (15481/37461)
    57% (384/674) Best of 3 Sets Win % 59% (364/614)
    0% (0/1) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
    50% (106/212) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 47% (71/152)
    47% (95/201) Deciding Set Win % 52% (103/198)
    86% (402/345) 1st Set Won, Won Match 87% (361/314)
    14% (402/57) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 13% (361/47)
    16% (284/45) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 21% (261/55)

    Potential H2H Matches This Week For Michael Geerts

    Abidjan 2 Challenger

    Geerts vs Shah H2H, could play in The Quarterfinals

    Geerts vs Baadi H2H, could play in The Quarterfinals

    Geerts vs Compagnucci H2H, could play in The Second round

    Geerts vs Kellovsky H2H, could play in The Second round

    View full predicted draw for Geerts

    Other Predictions

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    11:00
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    12:30
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...